Sections 302 (6), 324, 353, 392, 412 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 murder, attempted murder of AMD, assault or criminal force, robbery, dishonestly stolen property And the benefit of suspecting terrorism is attributed to the accused in the double murder case. During the bank robbery, two people were killed and both the accused were sentenced by the trial court under Section 302 (b) PPC and sentenced to death, which the sentence was justified by the High Court. The arrest of the accused was disclosed on 28 6000, which was not helped by the evidence which had a cone on the record, according to which his arrest was made immediately after the collision, the recovery memo was indicative of the fact that The pump action gun was recovered. However, the truth and authenticity of the memo from the accused was not beyond the board as the accused's name was later entered with different ink, a prosecutor's official said. Evidence has surfaced that the accused was carrying a bag at the time of his entry into the bank but no evidence has yet been on record whether he was ever used or otherwise because another prosecution witness has testified Whether the looted money was put in the bag by the co-accused or not. The suspect's bag was mentioned. The accused's case was related to his co-accused, against whom conviction and clear evidence came on the record linking him to the commission of the alleged crime; in the face of intense suspicion, his benefit was extended to the accused. , His case was related to his co-accused. The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence given to him by the lower courts and charged him
