GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus NASEER AHMAD KHAN
Section 1 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 2A and CHAP I [Arts 8 to 28] were allotted to the respondents to the fundamental rights jurisdiction bungalow, but the authorities took possession of the West Pakistan property. Retained (Residence of Government Officers) Ordinance, 1963, could not be a law against the provisions of the Constitution and if a law was unreasonable and it violated any fundamental rights, it could be terminated. This is due to the Supreme Court and the basic principles. Article 2A of the Constitution guarantees the rights read under the Constitution, the authorities failed to provide any valid or coherent reasons for the acquisition of the West Pakistan Acquisition Property (Residence of Government Officers) Ordinance, 1963. Why was it released in relation to the specific? Instead of proceeding with the property, if the property is required to pay the public interest, and to the public meeting, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Supreme Court refused to interfere in the High Court's appeal decision by explaining the market rate to the property owner.
