CHAIRMAN DR. A.Q. KHAN versus MALIK MUHAMMAD HAMID ULLAH KHAN
Section 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 4 and 5 Service Tribunals, jurisdiction to amend fines, a public servant was charged with leave without leave and was dismissed from employment. The service tribunal approved the fines with the mandatory retirement approval. The matter was seized and strict orders were required to be passed under the parameters of the constitution and the rules and regulations. The service tribunal had no jurisdiction to grant arbitrary relief in favor of anyone who witnessed the service tribunal, which was two lines in its decision. For whatever reason, it was not sustainable under the law as well as the principles on the subject. If the service tribunal decided to amend the decision, then the previous record of the public servant could be cited. I was mentioned about the basis of the charge sheet in which it was mentioned that even before that, three warnings / disciplinary violations letter to the official tribunal for unauthorized absence from the public servant Exceeded its authority in granting relief to, so the decision of the service tribunal was not sustainable in law, the judge said. Addiction placed on approved leave to appeal the decision adopted by the Appeal Tribunal and service side. Was allowed
