Section 21 law suits the testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 30, 90 and 100 pre-emptive suicides filed by the pre-emperor for joint venture with the vendor and partner in the joint holding. The lawsuit is in favor of the pre-importer but the lower appellate court did not declare it a suicide attack and amended the decree and restored the trial decision to the extent that it was part of the High Court holding the amended jurisdiction and The trial court-approved Wendes claimed that his father's pre-emptor was an adopted son, so he had no pre-emptive right to sue. The certified copy of the adoption of the father of the pre-empire was acceptable under 90% of the law evidence, 1984 this document and since this public document is more than 80 years old, its second legal evidence, under Article 100 Available, 1984 was not only denied, but rather articles were acknowledged that the relationship between the shopkeeper and the pre-emptor was fully substantiated by oral and documentary evidence before being discriminated against. Therefore, the whole land was ordered by autopsy and the High was applauded. The court was absolutely correct the appeal was dismissed
