The specific performance of the contract to sell the Authority for sale to the Section 12 Scope House was owned by the defendant woman and her husband, based on a power of attorney, not a sale agreement executed in favor of the plaintiff. It was claimed that the power of attorney was not executed for selling the house, but rather the house building finance corporation was executed before the house was constructed to obtain the loan and the rights of the claimant. I was put aside by the High Court order passed by the trial court and the case was being prosecuted. The dismissal was in reference to the General Power of Attorney Plot and not the house executed by the plaintiff, as soon as the power of attorney was executed shortly after the execution of the plot by the House Building Corporation and the plaintiff and the plaintiff. The husband had obtained a sale loan agreement. The house was about and neither mentioned a plot General Power of Attorney nor a real estate house, Anne or the house was built until the sale agreement showed that the defendant's husband had owned it. He was executed and neither his party was made a party to the defendant's husband during the trial, nor was any attempt made by the plaintiff to be called as a witness. That which was recorded by the High Court does not reflect any misunderstanding, nor was the reflection of the evidence supported by the parties. Unexpected appeal was dismissed
