KAZI TALMIZ ALIAS TANI versus SYED MAQBOOL MUHAMMAD SHAH
In 499 (5) of the Contempt of Regulation (XLV of 1860), section 302/324, the defendant complaining of the effect of the termination of the guarantee on sickness requested the termination of the bail on the basis that when the accused's bail was granted, So he has already recovered from the complaint illness. The accuracy tests performed on the advice of the Medical Board did not show anything unusual and all tests showed that the Medical Board postponed its final opinion as angiogram was unavailable, which is why earlier Voting was being prosecuted, which may be based on tests. As was usual on the advice of the board, the medical board had already expressed its observation and there was no reason for further delay in the matter. When the bail application was approved, the accused was in any trouble. Therefore, there was no justification for it. The court allowed the accused to surrender before the trial court appeal while the apex court ruled to grant bail.
