Shakil Shakeel was convicted under Section 426 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 316 sentence and was sentenced under Section 316, PPC, and the trial court denied the High Court's suspension. Was. It was also not proved whether the injuries were caused by the accused or the death of the injured persons. Other evidence from the record and the contents of the FIR also shows that the victim's death was a complaint. The injuries were not caused by the driver. Such statement in the FIR along with the evidence provided by the doctor suggesting that the accused was not liable for punishment under Section 316 of the Civil Hospital when he fell outside the hospital gate and died. Maybe, the PPC suspect had been behind bars for more than 3 years and was sentenced. Article 161616, the PPC was the first to object, therefore, its continuous detention based on such conviction would lead to injustice. ust suspended the accused's sentence and was released on bail. Appeal allowed \ r \ n
