Section 2 30b (b) Observational evidence on all material aspects of the case of Qatil Umid evidence was agreed, that the incident to the public event, witnesses could not be given the opportunity because the witnesses of the accused alleged that the time of the incident. And the location is recognized. Even though he sustained a fireworks injury to the deceased in his defense, but did not present any evidence to substantiate his claim, the investigation of the prosecution witnesses also revealed the defense plea taken by the accused court. Did not or did not suggest. The existence of such a plea could be accepted only if the accused's entire statement was not supported by the evidence of the prosecution, but when the evidence of the prosecution was relied upon, then the serious part of the accused's statement. Can also be taken into account. Who was the motivator of the present case, did not consider him a person of questionable character and the conviction of the accused and the punishment of the accused was maintained in the circumstances.
