SHAHZAD AHMED versus THE STATE THROUGH F.I.A. ISLAMABAD
Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Articles 420/468/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Electronic Crime Prevention (LXXII of 2007), Section 3/4/5 / 6/7/8/9/10/18/19 Electronic Transaction Ordinance (LI of 2002), Article 37 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) as a forgery of fraudulent documents and criminal misconduct. Using, on the refusal of bail, a work order was issued to the accused by a competent authority of the department. The accused supplied tender items to the Ministry of Interior, fake, the official treasury presented by the DG, FIA. Is a big associated with the report of The money was illegally confiscated. It was the courts' discretion to bail or deny the accused, whose relevant documents and statements were confirmed, the two courts at their sole discretion in favor of the defendants without violating the said reasons. Was denied. The various principles enshrined by the Supreme Court for the purpose of achieving equity must come to the Constitutional Court with a clear hand, because reflecting the material on the record of the accused was an obstacle to the Supreme Court's arbitrary process, which Apparently attached to the commission. In this case, the principle of perpetuation of the offense will not help the accused.
