Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ ALI versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Article 184 Scheme for employee rehabilitation, reimbursement of employees for ex-manual employees on request for reimbursement under ex-gratia payment case, made under Retirement Scheme for all manual / non-knowledgeable employees 2343 Relating to Employees Relating to Managed Employees and Bank Representatives of Bank Managers Negotiated for a Settlement, Under which the Bank Agrees to Pay Extra Payments to Repay Employees. Representatives of retrench employees leave for the Supreme Court to pay R determined this. Additional compensation justified in terms of the offer offered by the bank was properly accepted and the re-employees will be paid additional pre-payment according to the terms of the offer.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD v. SIKANDAR ALI KHAWAJA 2010 PLC(CS) 1216
• ATLAS KHAN v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN 2010 SCMR 1217
• HAMZA ALI HAMZA v. State 2010 SCMR 1219
• SHAHZAD AHMED v. THE STATE through F.I.A. Islamabad 2010 SCMR 1221
• FAHIM AHMAD ZAIDI v. HINA HOUSING PROJECT (PVT.) LTD. 2010 SCMR 1228
• ABDUL JABBAR v. State 2010 SCMR 1231
• WISRAM DAS v. SGS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. 2010 SCMR 1234
• UCH POWER (PVT.) LTD. v. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2010 SCMR 1236

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates phone number from Usta Mohammad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes