Sections 11, 12A, 18, 31 and 31 (2) Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 Land Acquisition, Permanent Order and Possession The plaintiff's request was that the government impose land encroachment on the suit land, in plaintiff's request that the plaintiff's entire land was occupied and compensated in 1951, it was announced on 11 6 1966 The award was granted without any protest, thus, the suit filed by the trial court in 1993, 42 years after the suit filed by him, was banned. And was reviewed by the High Court, the trial court had decided the case based on the specific object. The defendants raised such objections in the written statement and then revised, but the lower courts did not execute any of the awards which the plaintiff seized on the land in 1951, the award shows. Documents exhibited by the trial court showed that the amount of compensation received by the plaintiff was exactly what the Land Acquisition Collector finalized in terms of sections 11 and 12A. Had done. The plaintiffs of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after receiving compensation without protest, even allowed to file a reference under 18 read with Sections 30 and 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. There was no right, the courts below decided the case without objection. Such documentary evidence and the discovery of the courts, under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, have the effect of listening to the law and the facts.
