Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Suit Family Court for dissolving the marriage and recovering the dues, passed an order dissolving the marriage, but the appellate court granted relief to the diver for the diver. Declined. The court found that the family court's finding could not be disturbed without disturbing Khola, which would be equivalent to an appeal against dissolution, which was declared prohibited under Rule 14 (2) (b) West Pakistan Family. The Courts Act, 1964 will apply only when the decree passed for Dover did not exceed Rs. 30,000; in the present case, the plaintiff was not given any Dwyer amount, therefore, he refused to give priority. An appeal was made for the appropriate relief to Dover, which is a prerequisite for a proper marriage but the appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings of the case in which the appellate court This question is required. The plaintiff was entitled to diverge on the basis of the material available on the record bar contained in section 14 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the plaintiffs would not come to the Supreme Court to dismiss the judgment and the High Court Will receive a remand. After hearing both sides, his latest decision on eligibility is \ r \ n