Sections 4 364 and 2 302 (b) Conan Martyrs (of 1984 of the ten), Article 40 40 After the murder the evidence of the abduction and the evidence of Qital Ahmed was prosecuted by the prosecution, mainly by the accused Attached to the driver's testimony. The location of the incident and the location of the deceased's body, along with the burial place, were known to the police before the arrest of the accused, who had already confirmed these facts before other prosecution witnesses. Following his arrest during questioning on such facts, there was evidence of the presence of the prosecutor's witness at the police station at night where he gave the required information, the Inquiry Officer recovered the blood-stained batches. Had lied in reference to the accused's statement to the extent that he could lead to the recovery of Belchus, that was acceptable under Article 40 of the Law 40, 1984 Article 40, but with respect to the subsequent weapons of state crime. Such statement was inadmissible, neither confirmed nor confirmed by the Investigation Officer. It is very unsafe to rely on conflicting statements. However, the evidence on the part of the accused to go home and produce the shovel was admissible, as no one was aware at this point except that the defendant, according to the accused, automatically punished the accused in the absence of any piece of evidence. It was not enough, which could only corroborate the other evidence, that both the courts below sentenced the accused as the basis. Unacceptable evidence, the accused was acquitted under circumstances
