MUSHTAQ AHMAD KHOKHAR versus PAKISTAN POST OFFICE THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ISLAMABAD
Section 10 and Proviso Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) representation of service appeal to the Department on 169 2001, the representation of the jurisdiction of the department, represented by civil servants, from the representation of the civil 60 Did not respond by department within days. The servant preferred to appeal to the service tribunal within 30 days of the expiry of 60 days, which did not benefit, therefore, his appeal was barred and dismissed by the service tribunal. Prior to the ban, the timely priority appeal and the government employee also did not submit a seeking petition for delayed concession, followed by reminders by government employees of 30 9 2001, 3 7 2006 and 6 7 2006. In a letter dated 29th 2006 11 2006, addressing the civil servant, he said that he was represented by the competent authority on 16th 2001, which was earlier presented by him. Rejected it as. By extension, the extent of filing an appeal before the Service Tribunal will not be extended at all; the removal of the service (special powers) from the time limit of filing an appeal under section 10 of the Ordinance 2000, extends the civil servant Failure to answer any question regarding the law of public importance, the Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the service tribunal's decision to grant leave to appeal
