Find a Lawyer

DR. AYESHA SABIR versus FIDA UL HAQ

Section & Schedule and Schedule to Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the dowry filed by the plaintiff under a new application for retrieval of gold jewelery for the purpose of fact-finding in the facts of the case The foreign court family court did not consider the evidence and dismissed the case and the decision passed by the family court was upheld by the lower appellate court, while the family court on behalf of the high court dismissed the foreign country. The decision was excluded from the evidence and the Family Court had such a hearing. The High Appellate Court as well as the High Court were not challenged by the plaintiff, therefore, the plaintiff had no legal right to make such a protest before the Supreme Court; no particular question of the law of public importance was sought by the plaintiff. Was not raised but the appeal was denied

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• JAMSHED KHAN v. MUHAMMAD SAEED 2010 SCMR 1796
• JERRY PRINCE v. State 2010 SCMR 1800
• (SUO MOTU CASE FOR RECOVERY OF MINOR KIDS OF MST. TAHIRA JABEEN) 2010 SCMR 1804
• UCH POWER (PVT.) LTD. v. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2010 PTD 1809
• ZAFAR v. UMER HAYAT 2010 SCMR 1816
• ANSAR ALI v. State 2010 SCMR 1821
• UHAMMAD SHEHZAD MALIK v. MUHAMMAD SUHAIL 2010 SCMR 1825
• AKHLAQ HUSSAIN KAYANI v. ZAFAR IQBAL KIYANI 2010 SCMR 1835

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Sara e Naurang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes