Find a Lawyer

TOWN COMMITTEE, ALIPUR versus ALLAUDDIN

Article 188 The Supreme Court verdict was passed by the High Court to inappropriate respondents at the point of limitation, but the fact was not properly presented in which the unidentified verdict was also disputed by the Prima Fax, petitioner / Town Committee. Could not be allowed to handle. Property without legitimate entitlement In spite of the fact that there was a dispute between the parties on the issue of authenticity or whether a review was taken under any other agreement and the application for review was allowed. The order was withdrawn and the civil appeal was dismissed. The High Court decision was restored to its original count and it was ordered to be fixed after three weeks.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. Mst. LATIFA BIBI 2010 SCMR 1915
• SHAKEEL AHMED v. MUHAMMAD TARIQ FAROGH 2010 SCMR 1925
• SHAUKAT HAYAT v. State 2010 SCMR 1931
• Qazi ABDUL JALIL v. N.-W.F.P. FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION through Chairman 2010 SCMR 1933
• MEMBER, BOARD OF REV ENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE v. Mst. SAJIDA PARVEEN 2010 SCMR 1942
• KAUSAR PARVEEN v. KASB BANK LIMITED 2010 SCMR 1956
• MUHAMMAD BUX v. ABDUL AZIZ 2010 SCMR 1959
• SALAH-UD-DIN v. State 2010 SCMR 1962

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Ludhan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes