Section 2?2 (b) and Z 377 of the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979, 1979, 1979), Section 12 murder, unnatural offense, kidnapping or abduction to target a person unnatural The allegation was affirmed that no material was on record for direct evidence of the prosecution's witnesses that the allegations against the accused were falsified. The complainant continued in his statement in his cross-examination The defendant could not confirm his claim of bad blood due to inherited deprivation. The present rights of the accused were present in the agricultural property confiscated by any common ancestor or complainant among the parties, the doctor's testimony regarding oral examination is available, clearly the commission of unnatural crime with the tender age victim Was established due to injuries and death. The victim was not discharged Medical records of the prosecution's story were available on file so the location of the incident was intentionally changed so the case is not on the record. Or did the incident occur when the accused allegedly testified that the complainant's oral testimony was confirmed by the medical report, as well as in the report of the complainant's Chemical Examiner Eye witness, No evidence of involvement in the accused's record was disclosed. There was good reason why the complainant would be falsely involved in his own nephew because the evidence was appreciated in the proper context, but in the absence of reasons, it was not possible for the trial court to appeal.
