Sections 10 (3) and 11 define the evidence of rape and abduction, explaining the eight-day delay in filing an FIR and explaining why the accused had recovered a weapon, Proved by Victim's record. In the statement, the accused involved did not complain with the special role in the commission of the crime that there was no reason to stake the honor of the complainant's family members that the chemical executor on the vaginal shrubs The report was positive. The prosecution's witnesses testified to each other and there was no contradiction in their statements on the material points of detaining the victim for 18 days. And the allegation of his recovery from the house of the accused by the police proved to be beyond the shadows, however, under section 11 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979, the charge of abduction, kidnapping, was not proved, why According to each requirement of the law, there were material and clear contradictions in the statements made between the complainant and the victim. And even in the statements of each of them, Victim stated in his statement that he was kept in an unknown place, while in the same statement he stated that he was kept in the house of the accused, which was 2 km away. Was located at An acre-acre Victim from his house did not say that he was taken anywhere after the abduction, both sides confessed and it was proved that there was serious family dispute and litigation between the parties. And in this illegal situation, the establishment of fake conspiracies was made very clear, the prosecution's release under Section 11 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979
