Section 7 41itt Appeal against the Breath, The Principal's Court will not normally interfere with the Breath's decision and the trial court's finding will have appropriate weight and consideration, which saw the behavior of witnesses in addition to the recording of evidence and The testimony of the trial judge regarding the credibility of the witnesses I attended was examined, the initial application of the sentence of verdict was affirmed until each person was found guilty on the record. If the evidence is not re-evaluated, then different perspectives are not sufficient to interfere with the judgment of the failed court. That is, it will be found that the facts proved on the record have been found to be inaccurate, misleading, or concluding on the re-evaluation of the evidence, even if the findings of the trial court were entirely artificial. Hilarious and ridiculous, even if the material evidence is ignored, clearly misrepresented so that misconduct can lead to the capture of justice illegally, the court is accused of any benefit of the charges. Extra caution should be exercised in exercising jurisdiction over appeals against the rights of It is not enough to overlook techniques in a criminal case without causing any injustice. Interference with the accused's conduct
