Sections 2 (2 (b) and 7) of the 377 convicted AMD and unnatural crime evidence were not only normal for the defendant to appear, but were established through oral evidence, according to the medical evidence, post-mortem report, Not only was the commission of unnatural crime established, but also the victim was killed due to chest and abdominal pressure. With the extra-judicial confession of the accused before the prosecution's witnesses, the bells of fact were rushed and the exact location of the scene. As pointed out, this was also an element that supported the direct evidence of the accused's last viewing and operation of the scene. The evidence led to speculation about the prosecution's guilt. Probable evidence was that no material was suppressed by the complainant. For reasons such as recording the death sentence of the accused in the trial case. The lawsuit was filed which proved to be a legal record and it cannot be said that no technical error was found in the case either by the trial court's conviction of the accused, a 25-year-old strongman, the accused. Could not be interfered with, which had caused havoc with the minor. During the trial, under trial, the trial was not entitled to sympathy and relaxation for a period of 10/12 years.