Section 540 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Extravagant Offense and Calling a Witness to DSP to Attack a Person Appeared for, as witnesses investigated, re-investigated the matter and presented the second challan showing the name of the applicant / accused in column No.2, stated that under section 540, CRPC. The DSP has never been shown as a witness in the challan, the court can call anyone. At any stage as a court witness, but in the present case, the trial judge refused to call the DSP because he believed it was not necessary for the decision of the case only to the CDSP. There was no personal information about the facts of the case. Eyewitnesses inspected, visited the scene of the incident, sent the victim for medical examination and completed the investigation, whose name was not shown as a witness in the calendar, not necessary for a mere verdict of the case. The trial court, in the circumstances, rightly dismissed the defendant's request for DSP as a witness.
