The statement of the officer investigating Arts 3/4 manufacturing, owning or defining the intoxicating item was recorded after 14 years, but despite a long cross-examination co-defendant could not produce any sketch which was found guilty Was sentenced and sentenced to 10 years in prison. And he completed his sentence, but the accused remained absconding for almost 14 years and was declared an accused. The accused's case was of the same nature and the same evidence was presented by the prosecution against the accused, which was confirmed by all witnesses. Recovery from a second and auxiliary 11/2 kilogram heroin suspect whose chemical analysis confirmed the heroin could not be applied to such a large quantity of heroin The accused fails to establish his plea of false allegations Police version There was no animosity against the witnesses because the record of sending the sample to chemical examinations was delayed because the nerve to check would be irrelevant as two samples experiencing the positive supply of Section 103, CR PC, were sent to the Chemical Examiner on time. Were sent, in this case were not strongly attracted Police officers were recoverable witnesses who clearly deposed and connected Section 103, possession of heroin from the possession of the accused PLA violating the CRP was not sustainable, in the circumstances of the statements of police officers, several investigations. Nevertheless, I was not impressed that the confessional statement of the co-accused was given by a person. Who was prosecuted for the same crime, when the accused was a long time fugitive for almost 14 to 14 years, even on that basis
