SYED TAHIR HAIDER versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 33 & 45 45 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000X of XXV), Sections 2 (3) (i) (ii), 9 & 10 to include complainant in the list of non-sales tax returns Was required to file a file sales tax return on a quarterly basis pursuant to Chapter V of Para 2 (d) of the Special Quarterly Rules, 2007, which they did regularly, irrespective of whether the complainant was required to file a non-return filing. Was added to the list and fined. On filing of sales tax return for one month, the complainant had demanded that the imposition of penalty under Section 33 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 be declared invalid and the banned Chief Commissioner in the list of irresponsible persons. Error adding. The Commissioner of the Month told the complainant that the Commissioner (Enforcement) was asked to reopen the case under Section 45A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, for the fault, no fault proof mechanic was available on the complainant. Non-payment of showcase notes for separating monthly non-filers from quarterly non-filers, for which the department representative had no comprehensible justification for the fine and reflects fine, negligence, negligence. Is the equivalent of injustice and injustice and lack of commission. For corruption under Sections 2 (3) (i) and (ii) of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, the Chief Commissioner was instructed by the Federal Board of Revenue in 2000 to unlawfully impose a complaint on him. Confirm withdrawal of fines within 15 Day; issuing a letter of apology to the complainant; instruct PRAL to avoid such incidents.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
