SANA TRADERS, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 10, 66 and 67 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Sections 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 claiming a refund, the complainant exported a zero rating and claimed input Adjustment / Refund Claims along with required supporting documents submitted by the complainant, but nevertheless, sales tax authorities have not approved the refund. Non-payment of sales tax by suppliers was a systemic problem for which taxpayers had to suffer indefinitely if the suppliers could not prove that they could submit a sales tax to the public exchequer. This money should be made for submission and after that a refund claim will be made to the complainant. Return claims were handled irrevocably by the sales tax authorities, after which they were advised in writing for the delayed concession, and then released. The showcase notice was invalid for dismissing the claim due to the time bar, issuing the showcase notice for rejecting the claim that the SK deposit was not confirmed, without facing alice tax buyers and suppliers, Both were available for certification, spoke highly of the authorities, recommended all these actions and errors or recommendations for commission misconduct to the effect that payment verification and sales tax filing were recommended. ? Work will be done in the public exchequer within 15 days. And then a decision to claim a refund for a tax period within 15 days; a decision on the refund claim, as stated in the process.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
