AUTOMOBILE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD
Section 168 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000X of XXV), Sections 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 seizure and confiscation of imported vehicles by the customs anti-trafficking unit in the original appeal. And was seized. The order was actually rejected by the complainant against the order, the complainant filed another appeal before the appellate tribunal, which was accepted and the appellate tribunal directed the customs authorities to release the vehicle, despite the appellate tribunal. Despite instructing the authorities to leave the vehicle, the complainant was also threatened to confiscate the second vehicle of the complainant while the tribunal observed that in the favor of the complainant, the complainant observed The vehicle was being imported and sold by the source. Against the decision of the appellate tribunal, the vehicle is pending without any order of the High Court. To ensure the speedy execution of the appellate tribunal's decision and to leave the vehicle to its lawful owner without delay, the complainant. The right was illegal, arbitrary and provocative, which was in line with the recommendations of corruption, submitted to the Federal Board of Revenue. ; To investigate why the Appellate Phone was repeatedly misconduct by refusing to comply with appellate phone orders / decisions, without any order of the highest order of the Federal Board of Revenue, and Effective measures are in place to eliminate the possibility of any such breach. In the future; and reporting compliance within 21 days. r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
