SABA POWER COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 10, 66 and 67 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (2000 XXV), Sections 2 (3), Claims 9, 10 and 11 Refund Claims, an independent power producer, Securities and Exchange since 1994 Was a company registered with the commission. It has been alleged that the taxpayers of the Large Taxpayers Unit (LTU) failed to issue a system-generated acknowledgment of their sales tax return claim. Failed to decide on his claim within a fixed 45-day period pursuant to Section 10 (1) of the Sales Tax Act 1990. The decision of the complainant company's different request for review of certain sales tax declarations by SaLTU by the complainant's refund claim and reconsideration request from the Board at the time of the Board's business review. Is that it was extended three times in a fixed period. TLTU's Transaction Officers Neither Implemented Effectively nor Launched Investigation of Taxpayer Friendly Investigations, Disapproval of Refund Claim Receipt I should complain widely that the Federal Board of Revenue had not once complained to receive an extension, but failed to resolve the issue of amendment of revenue, even after a three-time extension. The three expansions also indicated wider aspects of tax breaks than instability or apathy. , Altitude and rape, was the equivalent of appearing by the \ LTU of the Federal Board of Revenue on the recommendation to take responsibility for the gross misconduct involved in the case. And get it wrong
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
