Section 9 (c) narcotics traffickers and smuggling evidence were recovered with a rusty green stitch packing in the form of four hundred 18 kilograms of sleepers, and was controlled by a bus. The recovered marijuana was sealed in two bags with two sealed parcels and another bag sealed marijuana was also sealed and that 10 grams of marijuana and 10 grams of marijuana were separated for chemical analysis and sealed separately. For example, the issue of counseling for the accused was understandable and convincing that not every sleep sample was taken, which is contradictory, cannot be taken lightly, because if the crime against drug If imposed, was punished severely under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997. The defendants, within any component of Section 9 of the Act, were found to be controlling the Narcotic Substitutes Act 1997, dealing with the procedure and presenting relevant provisions of the law, as well as expert reports. The evidence was to be presented. In the interest of justice, otherwise it would be impossible to keep the gross commodities recovered from the possession of the accused, but it was exemplified in the circumstances of the case that, not every goldsmith had taken this sample and believed it. It will be found that the substance recovered was not fully cross, in which case, the penalty is exempt while retaining the punishment under section 9 (c). Once the Drug Abuse Act of 1997 was overcome, the penalties were reduced to one, under which section 382B, CR PC's benefit would remain.
