Applicants of contempt of court Constitution Petition for Arts 199, 204, 4, 14 and 25, employees of government-owned company were banned from filing a claim in the company under invalid order and their employees were denied by the company. According to the specification requested by them. Referring to the court in this regard was a natural and fundamental right of every citizen / employee to knock on the doors of the Val Court for justice. And the court had to decide whether it was entitled to relief, claiming that company officials could not prevent employees from going to court because it would try to deprive them of their legal and legal rights. Employers' wishes and kindness should be kept at the mercy of the employees, the implied explanation sought by the employees was issued without valid justification and if such letters were left in the field, then anywhere in the country. No employee will be able to approach them. No one can be prevented from raising any objectionable decision or observation. No one in the company can be prevented from filing a claim. Since it would refuse to ask them for any relief, serious orders could not be allowed to remain in the field to satisfy the elite of the superior people, because under Article 25 of the Constitution, every citizen was equal in the eyes of the law. And under Article 4 of the Constitution, every body had to decide matters according to law; under Article 14 of the Constitution, human dignity was unacceptable; no contempt of court was contemptuous, illegal order and letter , The explanation states, was set aside. Such as illegal and constitutional guarantees
