Find a Lawyer

JAVAID AHMED versus MUHAMMAD IMRAN MALIK

Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Tenants' Eviction Statement of Landlord's Choice Scope Landlord requested the removal of a tenant based on outstanding personal need for monthly rent payments based on the controller's removal request Dismissed that neither the lower appellate court allowed the landlord's appeal, and the eviction order was approved by the tenant that the landlord himself did not appear in the witness box and had another cover In which he could use the property for himself. His lawyer could be examined to prove personal need and there was no compulsion that he would have appeared in the witness box. It was the landlord's personal need to choose the premises for his or her own personal needs and in this regard the intervention of the landlord could not be allowed. Extraordinary jurisdiction can only be made by the High Court if it appears that there was any fact of the reading or non-reading of any false news on the file and to indicate that the applicant did not read any false statement or evidence. Failed or was denied by the Lower Appellate High Court due to any irregularities in the lower appellate court's decision. Requests dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2011

• Miss NANCY RUTH BANEY v. DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLD 6
• HASHAAM SAEED v. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF COMPUTER AND EMERGING SCIENCES (NU-FAST) 2011 PLD 10
• LIAQUAT ALI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLD 14
• SHUJA KHAN BALUCH v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLD 25
• FAISAL ZAFAR MALIK v. AJMAL BUKHARI, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CDA, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLD 36
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2011 PLD 40
• NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY v. HAKAS (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2011 PLD 43
• WACKENHUT PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. Malik ZAFAR IQBAL AWAN 2011 PLC 196

All Islamabad judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Ambela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes