Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD versus MIAN GHOUS BUX (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD

Section 10 (4), 11 (2), 7, 8 and 26 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R28 Section RO 1204 (I) / 2007 Dated 11-12 2007 Filing of Input Tax Return Claims Limit Registered Parsons had zero rating exports and refund claims were filed which were rejected due to time constraints. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order of the Appellate Authority, with supporting documents under the R28 of the Sales Tax Rules 2006 on the proposed software and the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed.

Related judgments — Inland, 2011

• COMMISSIONER LEGAL DIVISION, KARACHI v. MERCK (PRIVATE) LIMITED, KARACHI 2011 PTD 382
• MEHAR DASTGIR LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR INDUSTRIES, MULTAN v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE 2011 PTD 401
• JEEA TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 405
• KAY CHEMIST, KARACHI v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEAL), KARACHI-III 2011 PTD 408
• COLLECTORATE OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, FAISALABAD v. ZAHEER SOAP FACTORY, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 429
• IHSAN YOUSUF TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 454
• COSY INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (RTO), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 456
• MADINA TRADERS, KAMOKE v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE 2011 PTD 460

All Inland judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Rohri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes