Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (RTO), FAISALABAD versus KEY AND EMMS (PVT.) LTD, FAISALABAD

Section 10, 46, & 66 and claim time74 are the time restriction of the claim for a refund. Registered person claims refund of sales tax in respect of zero supply Assistant Collector denied that refund claim was withheld by order in Collector (Appeal) set. The original and registered person was allowed to issue a decree to be able to file a case for holding a refund claim which will benefit from the notification dated 11 12 2007. The Supreme Court upheld the decision in PLD 1998 SC 64, and then the Tribunal 2008 PTD (Tribe) 0, lim, on the request of a citizen's money restriction by a public servant or any other technical On request, she was deported and discouraged if she was not legally payable. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Inland, 2011

• BASHIR PRNTING (PVT.) v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1069
• MUMTAZ GHANI TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. C.I.R.(A), (R.T.O.), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1073
• MUMTAZ GHANI TEXTILE (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1087
• AL-REHMAT TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1108
• HABIB CALICO WEAVING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1124
• AMTEX LTD., FAISALABAD v. CIR (RTO), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1140
• COLLECTOR SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, RTO, FAISALABAD v. KAMAL FABRICS, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1143
• C.I.R. LEGAL DIVISION, RTO, KARACHI v. JIN TECHNOLOGIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI 2011 PTD 1172

All Inland judgments of 2011 →

famous supreme court advocate from Raiwind lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes