C.I.R. LEGAL DIVISION, RTO, KARACHI versus JIN TECHNOLOGIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI
Sections 111, 122, 127 and 131 additions to their defined credit and expense increases for unspecified credit under Sections 111 (1) (a) and (d) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and non-taxable by the tax officer Excluded for expenditure was clear under section 111 (2) of section 111 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, if the increase was confirmed, the taxpayer's total income in the tax year immediately preceding the financial year. In which the above disclosure was made. According to the law, the provisions did not give the taxation officer any and / or blanket options for any tax year increase, the law prohibited that increase in the year before the fiscal year discovery, provided that the increase As per the law case. The taxpayers' tax year was 2007, which was selected for audit in 2008, but taxpayers were faced with the distinction of credit and debit entries through showcase notices. e 2009 2009 In 2009, the tax year related to the tax year until the discovery was made during the tax year 2008 to the period of 2008, section 111 (1) (a) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and (d) In accordance with the provisions of section 111 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the tax year, 2008, without any jurisdiction, shall not be illegal, illegal or lawful, on the part of the tax officer. Was not properly executed and the series increased. Were unsustainable could not interfere with the commissioner's affected order with which he was retained
