Find a Lawyer

SALLAHUDDIN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) drug possession testimonial testimony Defendant's evidence was consistent and reliable No prior hostility was established with the accused, 215kg of hashish was recovered from the accused, who was a drug smuggler, defense testimony testified. No contradictions were identified regarding the means of transportation through the use of disputed accused. No contradiction was identified in the prosecution's case. A five-day delay in sending samples to the Chemical Examiner was not fatal. Appeal was dismissed in the prosecution case.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• PARVEZ ALI v. Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM 2011 YLR 4
• Mrs. ZAHIDA KHAN v. Mst. GULNAZ QURESHI 2011 PLD 6
• MEHARBAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 8
• TOOT v. State 2011 YLR 11
• RASHID AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHABBIR 2011 PLD 16
• Haji WALI MUHAMMAD v. ASLAM PERVAIZ 2011 CLC 19
• EBRAHIM A. MERCHANT v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT KARACHI through District Coordination Officer 2011 MLD 21
• Mrs. SHAHNAZ SHUJA v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Home Department, Government of Sindh 2011 PLD 22

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

advocate from Dudial lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes