ABDUL HAMEED CHANNA versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 General Clause Act (in 1897), Section 21 Constitutional Applicants Employed to promote applicants from the College of Engineering and Technology, BS 19 to BS 20, seven years with the approval of the Board of Governors' College of Governors Withdrawal of development order after the break, reassessment of applicant's salary in BS 19 and recovery of difference of amount received from his retirement liabilities during this period between BS 19 and BS 20. Before the decisive step could be taken, the validity decision could be withdrawn and the Legislative Law College was established. The decisive actions of the borrower in BS20 for seven years, resulting in the rights of the borrower, were taken after the borrower took the compensation in BS20 and for a very long time, Done, the college couldn't withdraw its promotion order without releasing it. The retiring employee, upon notice and hearing it, expects something in his kitty on the occasion of his retirement, and if the authority retrieves everything from Katie's excuse that the authority made a mistake ten years ago, then The retiring employee will be left high and dry saying that at least the High Court declared the illegal injunction without legal authority and without legal influence. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
