MST. ANESA YAR\'MUHAMMAD DAUGHTER OF DR. YAR MUHAMMAD versus
Articles 263, 278, 282 and 374 Application for Property Administration Letter and Succession Certificate Object Object in his application, the lawyer of the complainant alleged that the property application had fraudulently disclosed property schedules. That was, should have been dismissed; and that an appropriate action could be initiated under Section 282 of the Succession Act, 1925, on the charge of alleged fraud and breach of trust. For the objection, the lawyer advised that the approval of the administration's letter be canceled by suspension of the evidence without inquiry. Thus, at this stage it cannot be said that whatever the objector was describing was true. And all this action must be reversed, whatever the facts and circumstances under which it can be drawn, will ultimately require inquiry and evidence, in which case, according to law, a suitable application for cancellation may be filed, The first aspect is there. Evidence in favor of such a request to r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
