SONERI TRAVEL AND TOURS LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE/DIRECTOR/SECRETARY versus SONERI BANK LIMITED
Sections 2 (xxiv), 39, 40 (4) (5), 42 and 92 Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Sections 37 (2) and 143 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 General Clause Act (X of 1897), section 3 (20) of the trademark and trade name of the plaintiff bank violating suit containing the terms of the plaintiff bank \ Sonari Bank Limited, Sonari Travel & Tours (Pvt) Limited \ Bank has requested an interim order to prevent him from using the word Sonari with the company name. The conditions set forth in Section 40 (4) of the Trademarks Ordinance 2001 were fulfilled, except that without the use of trademarks, the defendants of section 40 (4) of the Trademarks Ordinance 2001 were banned. The use of the non-trade mark of a mark is not prohibited under the name of the company in relation to the name of the company in accordance with the provisions of section 40 (4) of the ordinance use of the word \ Sonari in trade. Non-trademark use was the use of which the plaintiff did not identify any particular service or product offered to the public by the plaintiff using the word. ?By trademark, the plaintiff has only regarded passenger checks and credit card lines. I entered a trademark, thus, its reputation in connection with the banking services or business will not be relevant because concept Reputation of was associated with goods or services. Which trademark was registered to be associated with the bank account. Debit card was different from credit card. Debit card service linked to the banking business was offered by the claimant. There was nothing to be done. The plaintiff could not prove that the defendant
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
