MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY THROUGH COMPANY SECRETARY
Sections 39, 42 and 54 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O XXXX, RR 1 and 2 The cancellation of the contract, the declaration and the decree interim injunction, the agreement of the contract employment agreement was the unilateral exercise of electric power in Karachi. The employees of the Electric Supply Company (KESC) and the company had unilaterally changed the terms of the contract by forming a new service policy; the result was that the defendants' services were terminated. Demand for suspension, KESC's suspension was not a stand. That he had easily rejected the employment agreements but had tried to change the terms and conditions of service and then intended to adopt the contract in relation to multiple agreements if the terms and conditions of the contract were in line with the previous principles. Which can create irreversible. Obstacles to the release of the defendants from the job mala flations a way the new service policy was brought about weight and an additional factor to keep in mind when considering the question of interim relief Did not indicate that the new policy was implemented in a more transparent manner. And once it was in the field, even in the context of existing agreements with the plaintiffs, it was promptly processed against them. Because such people raised a serious question about the dishonesty of the KESC and whether the power of the contract awarded by the rules of the former service was done with good faith and honesty or for the plaintiff. Was sued for a baseless practice. Interim Discrimination Relief and Suspension
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
