AMIR NOMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS
Sections 42, 54 and 55 Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002, Regulations 2 34 and 19 2 2 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. X. X., RR 1 and 2 Suit for Declaration, Permanent and Mandatory Orders The plaintiff requests that for conducting marriage functions on a commercial basis, the defendant was setting up a marriage garden on a residential plot in the housing society in front of the plaintiff's house without the permission of the Karachi Building Control Authority and the City District / Government. ? And this proposed marriage will cause trouble for plaintiffs and residents in the area and will cause discomfort in their lives and deprive them of a peaceful stay interim order to prevent defendants from conducting such actions. application. The law suite plot was located in the Housing Society located on the main road. A proclaimed Commercial Road plaintiff began construction on the suit plot after obtaining the government's approval and presenting a building project approved by the building authority to establish the Society for Merid Garden City District Government, The defendant had previously granted \ NOC the commercialization fee, but consequently withdrew it, without notice, which the High Court Term uses commercially before. The front constitutional petition had a subpoena, which was outlined in the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations in total 19 2 2 2 6. Same, 2002, included in the \ marriage hall / lawn was included on marriage matters alls halls of the cases that were recorded in the trial. The plaintiff had no preliminary case which led to the ruling
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
