RABBIYA ASSOCIATIES THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus ZONG (CHINA MOBILE) THROUGH DIRECTOR
Sections 42 and 54 of the Radio Base Station Antenna Regulations, Protection of Health Impact of 2008, Pakistan 5 Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997), Sections 4 (1), 5 and 6 (1) of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) , O xxxIX, Rr 1 and 2 Interim Order, Antenna Recommendation Installation Approval The plaintiff company claimed that despite handing the project over to the residents / association, it was still the owner of the building and had no antenna on the roof. Could not be installed. Without this permission, the highest legal status of the plaintiff can be decided only after well-known evidence. The plaintiff also claimed for damages in the case, which also required proof that the plaintiff did not raise a single basis. Installation of antennas / towers is detrimental to human health, but such a request was made only. During the course of the arguments, according to the trial court, the plaintiff failed to present a first case for injunction and also failed to disclose any right above the roof top that was infringed or violated. The balance of the facility by the defendants was neither with the plaintiff nor there was no question of irreparable harm as the plaintiff has already claimed damages for the plaintiff to mount the antenna on the roof without the permission of the High Court. Allows Set up your rules for the installation of BTS / Antenna / FM towers, including the City District Government and Cantonment Board. Ulations in the Code should be the proper procedure for the approval of the Certificate of Objection not only to receive the fee but also to inspect / test and inspect the stability of the building / location proposed by its engineers and architects.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
