Find a Lawyer

NAA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PVT.) LTD. versus PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP UNIT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY SINDH, KARACHI

Applicants for A-VII, R 2, and O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 suit of declaration, permanent order and interim injunction for recovery of money failed to show direct alliance with the defendants. And there was no direct link between the ruling and the plaintiff party which caused the order to be submissive, the balance of convenience and irreparable loss should be present. In the present case the plaintiff failed to prove the first case in his favor. 'S case was not excluded. As recorded by the parties, the decision on whether to retain the suit will be taken at the time of the final decision of the suit.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• Syed ALI FIRDAUSI v. NAVEED JAHANGIR 2011 CLC 124
• NAWAB v. State 2011 YLR 127
• RABBIYA ASSOCIATIES through Proprietor v. ZONG (CHINA MOBILE) through Director 2011 PLD 132
• GHULAM SIDDIQUE SOOMRO v. THE STATE through Anti-Corruption/ Circle Officer Dadu 2011 MLD 133
• M. ASHRAF BULLO v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION through Managing Director 2011 PLC 142
• ASIF RAZA v. FAROZAN MIRZA 2011 CLC 143
• SAEEDULLAH SOOMRO v. State 2011 YLR 144
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI v. HUMAYUN ELLAHI SHAIKH 2011 PTD 145

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

pakistani advocates Tando Allahyar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes