MUHAMMAD USMAN RAJAR versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Section 25A & 38 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Sections O15 (2), (3) (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Service of the applicant who was dismissed. For the past 20 years, continuous service, an accident and his legs were broken and he was sent for treatment, the employee applied for payment of his pending bills to the applicants / employer, upon confirmation of the employee's request. The employee found out that his bill had already been paid, and after finding the employee's misconduct request, he served the charge sheet and The choir has accepted the request of the employment complaint against the order of dismissal of the employee. The Labor Court and the employee were ordered to be reinstated to the job with all back benefits, but the appellate tribunal rejected the Labor Court and the employee's decision by applying for a constitutional petition to pay and / or pay the abolished bill, mismanagement. Saying that standing at the height of employees breaches all the principles of equity and fair play and reflects patent rich pride. The appellate tribunal had delivered the employer's unanticipated decision in a slim way and there was no reasonableness as to why and under what circumstances. And the labor court's order was upheld by the appellate tribunal, which was violated, and the Labor Court affirmed it, and in the circumstances and circumstances of the case, the letter and spirit of the Labor Court order Was instructed to enforce accordingly.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
