In section Q 42 of the Convention of Martyrs (Article X of 1984), Article 118 on the evidence of anonymous transactions, he was accused of filing a lawsuit against his father that he owned the house he owned. , Who had no source of income at the time and was thus a father of his father, thus possession of property was also a deciding factor in the transaction in Benami and since the construction of the house on the plot discussed thereafter. It was permanently established in the plaintiff and its occupation. Although the other members of the family were not located in the defendant's home, the occupation of only one room, which was closed, was the evidence under Article 118 of the Act, 1984, in such cases. He asserted that the other person in whose name this property was purchased was a real estate owner but once the initial load was removed, it was for the beneficiary to prove that he owned the property. In the name of his minor son he bought the property in question and his minor son was nothing but his realtor and could not claim to own the property in the claim that the suit had been decided in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
