MUHAMMAD AFAQ SHAMSI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB
Section 5 (r) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 265K Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 62 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Wolf default execution court paid the defaulter company in arrears in installments Holder Bank through the reorganization of the original agreement, while hearing the deliberately filed default complaint against the company by the National Accountability Bureau, in the Accountability Court filed under Section 265K, CR PC Was excluded, despite the certificate issued by the holder's bank order that the company regularly issued installments in accordance with the new agreement. Payment of the National Accountability Bureau claimed that once when the investigation and offered to return the assets to the accused person's Chairman, National Accountability Bureau's discretion to refer the case. Whether or not the court approves, and has to be paid to the National Accountability Bureau and its payment to the bank will not relieve the company from its criminal liability. The request from the National Accountability Bureau states that payments made directly to the bank by the company will not be subject to restrictions that maintain a reasonable balance of responsibility. The new contract for debt restructuring was accepted by the court while the execution petition was pending, according to the new agreement, quarterly payments were being made, so it cannot be said that in section 5 (r) of the National Accountability Act. The statement is deliberately defaulted. The ordinance, 1999 was a flurry of original contract between the new contract company and the bank and once the contract was renewed, the rights under the contract
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
