Section 12 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Receiving Interim Order Damage Bank Guarantee The plaintiffs on the one hand assert their right to demand the specific performance of the goods supply agreement. Was doing certain performance and showing no interest in bank guarantee money or damages, but on the other hand the Inquiry Bank Guarantee found that it was going to expire if the plaintiff was interested in specific performance. Should not have surrounded the bail, no matter what. After the acquisition of the High Court's interim order, the disclosure of the bank guarantee did not appear to be a preliminary case in favor of the claimant and meant the withdrawal / withdrawal of the right to retain the order until the final judgment of the same case when the plaintiff was the first Failure to make the aspect, besides, the balance of the facility was neither in favor of it nor the banker when no irreparable loss was raised. The Anti-Breach was breached due to non-contractual failure but the Plaintiff also claimed extensive compensation / compensation, therefore, the Claimant was not entitled to any relief.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
