Claims for bankruptcy recovery clauses 9 and 10 In order to defend this case, the fact of the grant of principles and the question of the law's reasonableness was raised by the defendant (Plea), who raised a question about the law and the facts. And cannot be determined without a recording of the evidence. Accuracy was only a financial benefit, which was accepted by the defendant, who fully accepted the benefit and also acknowledged the implementation of the documents paid by the defendant, which appeared in the statement of accounts. And nothing was paid to the account. Identifying the plaintiff's bank by the plaintiff's bank, as no inquiry was required by an expert or recording the evidence failed to raise any specific question regarding the plaintiff's law or facts, therefore, the High Court sought The defendant's case was ordered in the circumstances of the refusal to leave
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
