Complainant accused of dishonesty of Section 489F Criminal Code (V 1898), Sections 249A, 417 (2A) and 435/439 Czech Penalty Scope Check, was indicted by complainant. An FIR was filed against Section 489F, PPC; however, the accused was acquitted under Section 249A, there was a matter of complaint between the CRPC regarding the property between the parties, section 154 In its statement under, CRPC did not release the reason for which the check was issued and admitted that it had been found. Payment complainants in lieu of scrutiny, therefore, did not have any form of complaint which, therefore, was not a case of dishonesty of checks which could have attracted the consequential consequences of the provision of section 489F, PPC. ? Only when a check has been issued towards payment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation. And if such an offer was dishonored, section 489F would attract the conclusions made by the PPC. In the present case, the check was issued because the accused had received money from the complainant and the complainant had received more than that. The loan has not been repaid nor will any obligation be fulfilled. In any case, the provisions of Section 99 PPF, PPC cannot be brought to trial against the accused, as there was no basis for interference in the court-approved order below,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
