Sections 497 (2) of the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9 (a) (ix), 9 (b), 24 (d) and 25 (b) of fraud, corruption and corruption proceedings, bail, and further investigation. Accused of being a Managing Director of a company receiving millions of rupees from the allotment of his residential project, but the physical possession of the plots failed to be handed over to the Allies and thus widespread fraud. What was the crime of giving Section 9 (a) (ix) of the National Accountability Ordinance was violated, the 1999 housing project was started in July 1980, and officials were not charged that the land was not available on the site or There is a double allotment and there is no charge. The development work was not completed, the cancellation of the allotment for violating the terms and conditions of 59 allotments of 2000 allotments over a period of 30 years cannot be termed as fraud and fraud in the sense of Secetto. The N9 (A) (ix) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in the completion of the development work, and it was specifically stated that the accused's company was to hand over physical possession to the Allies. Ready and ready. The allegation of delay in the development work and payment of all outstanding installments and payment of public dues cannot be exclusively attributed to the accused's company without recording any evidence. There was a chronic pressure patient, uncontrolled hypertension and unstable angina for which he had to undergo periodic medical checkups and was advised for coronary angiography.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
