MUHAMMAD ATHER HAFEEZ KHAN versus SSANGYONG & USMANI JV
O XXXVIII, R 5 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 20, 42 and Second Schedule Arbitration Procedure, Plan of Construction of Defendant (Foreign Company), in which the Plaintiff Contracting to Provide Counseling Services Provide assistance in obtaining tax benefits through or reduce its tax burden on its business activities before applying for a percentage payment of tax benefits received by the defendant on non-payment to the plaintiff. Retain Defendant's Bills on behalf of Defendants in the Tax Benefits Received by the Owner Whether the work will be a debt owed to the defendant, in the absence of a term to the contrary in the contract, in the sense of O XXXVIII, the plaintiff will be considered as the property belonging to the contractor, arrested by the CPC plaintiff. That if the defendant receives the money from his project owner, then he will be sent abroad as well so that he will not be able to enforce any decree in Pakistan O XXXVIII, made against the defendant. In order to apply R 5 (1) (b), the CPC plaintiff had to show that the defendant had to remove his property from the jurisdiction of the court. Roerich was intended that the plaintiff had not shown any such delivery. If this happens, it will have to do with the intent to defeat it, or there will be disruption to the decree it receives. Such an application was dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
