SAHIBZADA GHULAM MUHAMMAD KHAN versus NAWAB JAHANGIR KHANJI
Sections 39, 42 and 54 of the Property Distribution and Distribution (State of the State Janagarh) Order, 1963, Arts 1 (3), 2 (3) and Schedule I, Senior No. 2 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), XML, R 1 The petition for the appointment of the recipient of the suit land belonging to Jangarh, has been charged as one of the legal heirs of the claim of cancellation and permanent injunction against the defendant before the Government of Pakistan. The notification that the notification was issued was illegal in the absence of Vristanma. And that the first respondent did not have the power to enforce the sale agreement in respect of the suit land but without the approval of the government, the High Court had directed the parties to retain the status quo in respect of the suit land. Without the government's approval under Article 1 (3) of the Property Order Distribution and Distribution, the 1963 government had not yet given permission to the first plaintiff to sell the suit land, the second defendant started the housing project on the suit land. , According to the report of the local commission, that different persons built houses on more than 1/3 of the suit area, while 2/3 of the suit area surrounded by the walls of the outpost was with the other respondent. The appointment of the suit must protect the land from rubbish, destruction and illegal and illegal occupants. The High Court appoints Nazir as the recipient of instructions to seize the suit land from another plaintiff and reproduce the report, alleging possession of the suit land and disclosure of the checks allegedly received by the second defendant.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
