PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY, KARACHI versus MS. FARIDA BAIG
The cancellation of the plot allotment for the declaration of section 4242 was working with the Ministry of Defense and in the year in question question they were allotted the plot, after the death of their father, the plaintiffs plotted in their names. A petition for change was made, but instead the defense housing authority canceled the plot on the grounds that his father was not entitled to an allotment trial court, and the lower appellate court together decided the case in favor of the defendants. The letter of authority's accuracy was in response to the letter of the defendants canceling the allotment, demanding a change in the plot. No notice of cancellation of the late legacy was issued by the Authority at any stage before seeking their renaming; for twenty-three years, the authorities did not question the eligibility for becoming a member of the Society or for the Allotment at Stage. picked up. Served on the basis of the qualifications of the Deputy Secretary with the Ministry of Defense, Mutofi was made M the year, Amber of the Society in 1963, and in the year 1972, he applied for the allotment of a commercial plot which, after balloting, At no point before the plaintiffs, at any stage did the defendants seek inquiry into their names, the defendant's membership was questioned by the Defense Housing Authority or the former Defense Housing \ Society's own witness at the trial. The court stated that Mutofi was made a member of the society and that he was allotted a residential plot in Category A In 1973, he sought an allotment, a commercial plot which was approved after all the formalities and without any prior notice, was canceled at that stage.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
